Title

COMMUNITY COORDINATOR

Employees

14,197

Agencies

126

Average Base Salary

$66,678.72

Total Payroll

$3,316,835,518.57

Agencies Using This Title

  1. DISTRICT ATTORNEY RICHMOND COU

    46 employees, $11,933,746.18 total payroll

  2. Kings DA

    46 employees, $2,366,093.23 total payroll

  3. HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION

    45 employees, $6,622,611.83 total payroll

  4. OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER

    41 employees, $7,550,419.09 total payroll

  5. CULTURAL AFFAIRS

    37 employees, $9,076,044.51 total payroll

  6. DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE

    37 employees, $9,073,396.83 total payroll

  7. BOROUGH PRESIDENT-STATEN IS

    31 employees, $11,395,715.70 total payroll

  8. BOROUGH PRESIDENT-QUEENS

    31 employees, $9,636,881.95 total payroll

  9. BUSINESS INTEGRITY COMMISSION

    28 employees, $6,861,715.40 total payroll

  10. CIVILIAN COMPLAINT REVIEW BD

    27 employees, $6,741,382.66 total payroll

  11. NYC POLICE PENSION FUND

    24 employees, $7,462,392.69 total payroll

  12. EQUAL EMPLOY PRACTICES COMM

    22 employees, $2,314,210.61 total payroll

  13. Bronx DA

    19 employees, $1,218,435.73 total payroll

  14. FINANCIAL INFO SVCS AGENCY

    17 employees, $4,443,747.25 total payroll

  15. Queens DA

    15 employees, $961,863.03 total payroll

  16. OFFICE OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE

    14 employees, $649,179.94 total payroll

  17. NYC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS

    13 employees, $2,101,529.19 total payroll

  18. DEPT OF RECORDS & INFO SERVICE

    12 employees, $2,913,542.67 total payroll

  19. Spec Narcs-DA

    12 employees, $901,392.74 total payroll

  20. DEPARTMENT OF INVESTIGATION

    10 employees, $2,865,625.56 total payroll

Pay Summary

Rows
56,477
Average total compensation
$58,728.96
First fiscal year
2014
Last fiscal year
2025

Top Earners By Year

Fiscal Year 2019

  1. VINCENTE Z FRANCISCO JR.

    DEPT OF INFO TECH & TELECOMM • $162,219.55

  2. MARK IZNYUK

    DISTRICT ATTORNEY-MANHATTAN • $156,066.87

  3. TREVOR A CLARKE

    DISTRICT ATTORNEY-MANHATTAN • $143,676.55

  4. MATTHEW SEPKOWSKI

    DISTRICT ATTORNEY-MANHATTAN • $140,903.56

  5. JOHN R KEILING

    DISTRICT ATTORNEY-MANHATTAN • $133,086.09

Fiscal Year 2018

  1. SHARON MILLAN

    DEPT OF INFO TECH & TELECOMM • $174,460.00

  2. CHARITY UKASOANYA

    ADMIN FOR CHILDREN'S SVCS • $137,564.33

  3. MARK IZNYUK

    DISTRICT ATTORNEY-MANHATTAN • $133,883.81

  4. YAO-TUNG HO

    DISTRICT ATTORNEY-MANHATTAN • $127,406.32

  5. JOHN R KEILING

    DISTRICT ATTORNEY-MANHATTAN • $126,536.88

Fiscal Year 2017

  1. ERLINE DUVERNAY

    DEPT OF INFO TECH & TELECOMM • $229,554.56

  2. HARVEY L SIMON

    DEPT OF INFO TECH & TELECOMM • $219,556.56

  3. YCHELINA SIMPSON

    DEPT OF INFO TECH & TELECOMM • $183,148.34

  4. JOSEFINA M GARO

    DEPT OF INFO TECH & TELECOMM • $182,747.13

  5. MATTHEW SEPKOWSKI

    DISTRICT ATTORNEY-MANHATTAN • $150,423.35

Fiscal Year 2016

  1. CHRISTIAN QUINTANILLA

    DEPT OF HEALTH/MENTAL HYGIENE • $147,158.41

  2. JALEAN ANTHONY

    DEPT OF INFO TECH & TELECOMM • $142,130.19

  3. BLAISE F ODDO

    DISTRICT ATTORNEY-MANHATTAN • $140,091.69

  4. MARK IZNYUK

    DISTRICT ATTORNEY-MANHATTAN • $129,941.22

  5. GREGORY L WILSON

    DISTRICT ATTORNEY-SPECIAL NARC • $126,432.43

Fiscal Year 2015

  1. JOHN R KEILING

    DISTRICT ATTORNEY-MANHATTAN • $150,856.99

  2. CHRISTIAN QUINTANILLA

    DEPT OF HEALTH/MENTAL HYGIENE • $141,394.95

  3. BLAISE F ODDO

    DISTRICT ATTORNEY-MANHATTAN • $128,479.53

  4. PICHIT EIUMAUTAMA

    DISTRICT ATTORNEY-MANHATTAN • $127,796.36

  5. YAO-TUNG HO

    DISTRICT ATTORNEY-MANHATTAN • $125,157.65

Fiscal Year 2014

  1. YAO-TUNG HO

    Manhattan DA • $118,708.73

  2. PICHIT EIUMAUTAMA

    Manhattan DA • $115,662.04

  3. RAFAEL CARVAJAL

    DEPT OF CITYWIDE ADMIN SVCS • $108,018.62

  4. CHRISTIAN QUINTANILLA

    DEPT OF HEALTH/MENTAL HYGIENE • $107,695.89

  5. YVONNE T DANCY

    Manhattan DA • $107,328.93

Source and Caveats

Source for v1: NYC Open Data dataset k397-673e. Raw source rows are preserved as imported.

OT hours before FY2023 are not directly comparable to FY2023 and later because the source methodology changed. Some names, agencies, and other fields may be redacted in the source and are displayed as provided.