Title

COMMUNITY COORDINATOR

Employees

14,197

Agencies

126

Average Base Salary

$66,678.72

Total Payroll

$3,316,835,518.57

Agencies Using This Title

  1. DISTRICT ATTORNEY RICHMOND COU

    46 employees, $11,933,746.18 total payroll

  2. Kings DA

    46 employees, $2,366,093.23 total payroll

  3. HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION

    45 employees, $6,622,611.83 total payroll

  4. OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER

    41 employees, $7,550,419.09 total payroll

  5. CULTURAL AFFAIRS

    37 employees, $9,076,044.51 total payroll

  6. DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE

    37 employees, $9,073,396.83 total payroll

  7. BOROUGH PRESIDENT-STATEN IS

    31 employees, $11,395,715.70 total payroll

  8. BOROUGH PRESIDENT-QUEENS

    31 employees, $9,636,881.95 total payroll

  9. BUSINESS INTEGRITY COMMISSION

    28 employees, $6,861,715.40 total payroll

  10. CIVILIAN COMPLAINT REVIEW BD

    27 employees, $6,741,382.66 total payroll

  11. NYC POLICE PENSION FUND

    24 employees, $7,462,392.69 total payroll

  12. EQUAL EMPLOY PRACTICES COMM

    22 employees, $2,314,210.61 total payroll

  13. Bronx DA

    19 employees, $1,218,435.73 total payroll

  14. FINANCIAL INFO SVCS AGENCY

    17 employees, $4,443,747.25 total payroll

  15. Queens DA

    15 employees, $961,863.03 total payroll

  16. OFFICE OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE

    14 employees, $649,179.94 total payroll

  17. NYC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS

    13 employees, $2,101,529.19 total payroll

  18. DEPT OF RECORDS & INFO SERVICE

    12 employees, $2,913,542.67 total payroll

  19. Spec Narcs-DA

    12 employees, $901,392.74 total payroll

  20. DEPARTMENT OF INVESTIGATION

    10 employees, $2,865,625.56 total payroll

Pay Summary

Rows
56,477
Average total compensation
$58,728.96
First fiscal year
2014
Last fiscal year
2025

Top Earners By Year

Fiscal Year 2025

  1. STEFAN G ANTOINE

    DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION • $213,319.90

  2. JOE GIRALDO

    DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION • $196,277.89

  3. DAWEI MA

    DISTRICT ATTORNEY-MANHATTAN • $187,226.85

  4. OLIN MCFADDEN

    DISTRICT ATTORNEY-SPECIAL NARC • $175,910.78

  5. CHRISTINE M CLYDE

    NYC POLICE PENSION FUND • $170,460.36

Fiscal Year 2024

  1. DAWEI MA

    DISTRICT ATTORNEY-MANHATTAN • $240,913.51

  2. DIONNE M GRAY

    ADMIN FOR CHILDREN'S SVCS • $224,465.44

  3. MATTHEW SEPKOWSKI

    DISTRICT ATTORNEY-MANHATTAN • $195,161.25

  4. DEVON L SIMMONS

    DEPT. OF HOMELESS SERVICES • $170,286.58

  5. STEFAN G ANTOINE

    DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION • $168,547.85

Fiscal Year 2023

  1. DAWEI MA

    DISTRICT ATTORNEY-MANHATTAN • $243,935.61

  2. MARK IZNYUK

    DISTRICT ATTORNEY-MANHATTAN • $196,346.34

  3. DOMINGO SANCHEZ

    DEPT OF PARKS & RECREATION • $193,711.64

  4. CATHERINE A CASTRO

    DEPT OF HEALTH/MENTAL HYGIENE • $188,502.39

  5. MATTHEW SEPKOWSKI

    DISTRICT ATTORNEY-MANHATTAN • $182,511.47

Fiscal Year 2022

  1. DAWEI MA

    DISTRICT ATTORNEY-MANHATTAN • $227,865.75

  2. MARK IZNYUK

    DISTRICT ATTORNEY-MANHATTAN • $211,527.24

  3. TOMMY CHAN

    DISTRICT ATTORNEY-MANHATTAN • $193,118.07

  4. DOMINGO SANCHEZ

    DEPT OF PARKS & RECREATION • $171,182.00

  5. RAFAEL G RIVERA

    DEPT OF CITYWIDE ADMIN SVCS • $156,965.49

Fiscal Year 2021

  1. TOMMY CHAN

    DISTRICT ATTORNEY-MANHATTAN • $187,265.25

  2. DAWEI MA

    DISTRICT ATTORNEY-MANHATTAN • $182,806.47

  3. NISRIN SHAH

    DISTRICT ATTORNEY-MANHATTAN • $180,671.63

  4. RAFAEL CARVAJAL

    DEPT OF CITYWIDE ADMIN SVCS • $171,047.69

  5. KENNY W CHAN

    DISTRICT ATTORNEY-MANHATTAN • $156,340.63

Fiscal Year 2020

  1. MARK IZNYUK

    DISTRICT ATTORNEY-MANHATTAN • $191,711.36

  2. DAWEI MA

    DISTRICT ATTORNEY-MANHATTAN • $142,216.68

  3. KENNY W CHAN

    DISTRICT ATTORNEY-MANHATTAN • $139,436.95

  4. MIKHAIL MULADZHANOV

    DISTRICT ATTORNEY-MANHATTAN • $137,957.10

  5. YAO-TUNG HO

    DISTRICT ATTORNEY-MANHATTAN • $135,340.60

Source and Caveats

Source for v1: NYC Open Data dataset k397-673e. Raw source rows are preserved as imported.

OT hours before FY2023 are not directly comparable to FY2023 and later because the source methodology changed. Some names, agencies, and other fields may be redacted in the source and are displayed as provided.