Agency

NYC HOUSING AUTHORITY

Employees

32,931

Rows

169,327

Titles

358

Total Payroll

$10,629,873,554.35

Fiscal Year Filters

Top Earners

  1. MERQUISIDEC AQUINO

    $1,121,690.21 across 12 records

  2. JOHN JACOB

    $1,121,590.07 across 12 records

  3. JHOAN R TAVAREZ

    $1,121,317.74 across 12 records

  4. MARK ZURITA

    $1,121,105.34 across 12 records

  5. ANTONIA ZAMBRANO

    $1,120,785.32 across 12 records

  6. GMASNOH J WILLIAMS-GERRIN

    $1,120,517.73 across 12 records

  7. MARAT BROZGOL

    $1,120,356.02 across 12 records

  8. JOSEPHINE MASTANDUNO

    $1,120,283.48 across 12 records

  9. RICHARD L MILLER

    $1,120,272.76 across 11 records

  10. JORGE OLMO

    $1,120,140.30 across 12 records

  11. DIMITRIOS DOUVRES

    $1,120,136.03 across 11 records

  12. CHARLES E FENNER JR

    $1,120,053.64 across 11 records

  13. VIVIAN L SIFONTES

    $1,119,866.30 across 12 records

  14. IVAN VINTCHEL

    $1,119,812.61 across 5 records

  15. CYRIACA DECAILLE

    $1,119,683.58 across 12 records

Most Common Titles

  1. ASSOCIATE OPERATIONS COMMUNICATIONS SPECIALIST

    1 employee, 9 rows

  2. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF DESIGN

    5 employees, 8 rows

  3. *SENIOR ESTIMATOR

    4 employees, 8 rows

  4. ADMINISTRATIVE PUBLIC RECORDS OFFICER

    3 employees, 8 rows

  5. CONSULTANT ON RACE RELATIONS

    3 employees, 8 rows

  6. GEOLOGIST

    3 employees, 8 rows

  7. IT PROJECT SPECIALIST

    3 employees, 8 rows

  8. SUPERVISOR OF MECHANICS

    3 employees, 8 rows

  9. DIRECTOR OF PROGRAM PLANNING

    2 employees, 8 rows

  10. PUBLIC RECORDS OFFICER

    2 employees, 8 rows

  11. ASSISTANT TO THE CHAIRMAN

    4 employees, 7 rows

  12. ASSISTANT URBAN DESIGNER

    4 employees, 7 rows

  13. CUSTODIAN

    4 employees, 7 rows

  14. DIRECTOR OF REVIEW & COUNSELING

    3 employees, 7 rows

  15. DIR OF AUDIT & PROG ANALYSIS

    3 employees, 7 rows

Source and Caveats

Source for v1: NYC Open Data dataset k397-673e. Raw source rows are preserved as imported.

OT hours before FY2023 are not directly comparable to FY2023 and later because the source methodology changed. Some names, agencies, and other fields may be redacted in the source and are displayed as provided.