Agency

DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE

Employees

4,641

Rows

26,983

Titles

145

Total Payroll

$1,932,604,570.84

Fiscal Year Filters

Top Earners

  1. TASHA GRANT

    $994,668.90 across 12 records

  2. IDRIZ METOVIC

    $993,976.07 across 12 records

  3. EMIL CANGRO

    $993,804.34 across 12 records

  4. JOAN P BEST

    $993,652.60 across 12 records

  5. MICHELE MIRRO

    $993,406.04 across 9 records

  6. DIANE BRADLEY

    $992,335.98 across 12 records

  7. JONATHAN MUI

    $991,741.06 across 12 records

  8. DINO JEAN-PIERRE

    $991,245.33 across 12 records

  9. ANNETTE MC CLEAN

    $991,135.52 across 12 records

  10. ANNE LAU

    $990,835.83 across 11 records

  11. CASSANDRA WHARTON

    $990,657.30 across 12 records

  12. LUIS A MORALES

    $989,587.58 across 12 records

  13. MING LI HUANG

    $988,640.82 across 12 records

  14. RICHARD BALLERINI

    $987,389.45 across 10 records

  15. MIGUEL REYES

    $987,343.50 across 12 records

Most Common Titles

  1. LEGAL SECRETARIAL ASSISTANT

    4 employees, 10 rows

  2. MORTGAGE TAX EXAMINER

    3 employees, 10 rows

  3. YOUTH APPRENTICE

    9 employees, 9 rows

  4. COLLEGE AIDE - ASSIGNMENT LEVELS II AND III

    8 employees, 9 rows

  5. HIGH SCHOOL STUDENT AIDE

    8 employees, 9 rows

  6. EXEC ASST TO THE COMMISSIONER OF FINANCE

    4 employees, 9 rows

  7. STAFF ANALYST TRAINEE

    4 employees, 8 rows

  8. CITY COLLECTOR

    3 employees, 8 rows

  9. SECRETARY OF COMM

    1 employee, 8 rows

  10. ADMIN COMMUNITY RELATIONS SPECIALIST

    3 employees, 7 rows

  11. ADMINISTRATIVE PUBLIC INFORMATION SPECIALIST NM FORMER M1/M2

    2 employees, 7 rows

  12. CHIEF REVIEW ASSESSOR

    2 employees, 7 rows

  13. SENIOR PHOTOGRAPHER

    1 employee, 7 rows

  14. CERTIFIED LOCAL AREA NETWORK ADMINISTRATOR

    4 employees, 6 rows

  15. SUPERVISING COMPUTER SERVICE TECHNICIAN

    2 employees, 6 rows

Source and Caveats

Source for v1: NYC Open Data dataset k397-673e. Raw source rows are preserved as imported.

OT hours before FY2023 are not directly comparable to FY2023 and later because the source methodology changed. Some names, agencies, and other fields may be redacted in the source and are displayed as provided.