Title

COLLEGE AIDE - ASSIGNMENT LEVELS II AND III

Employees

378

Agencies

26

Average Base Salary

$18.02

Total Payroll

$8,477,568.25

Agencies Using This Title

  1. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

    132 employees, $3,458,238.48 total payroll

  2. DEPT OF YOUTH & COMM DEV SRVS

    49 employees, $1,274,621.46 total payroll

  3. DEPT OF HEALTH/MENTAL HYGIENE

    44 employees, $793,463.39 total payroll

  4. DEPARTMENT OF SANITATION

    20 employees, $449,414.13 total payroll

  5. INDEPENDENT BUDGET OFFICE

    18 employees, $74,299.39 total payroll

  6. TEACHERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM

    17 employees, $623,143.07 total payroll

  7. DEPARTMENT OF BUILDINGS

    11 employees, $340,876.65 total payroll

  8. FINANCIAL INFO SVCS AGENCY

    11 employees, $272,779.04 total payroll

  9. LAW DEPARTMENT

    11 employees, $164,395.02 total payroll

  10. DEPT OF INFO TECH & TELECOMM

    9 employees, $141,969.91 total payroll

  11. DEPT. OF DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION

    9 employees, $136,095.33 total payroll

  12. OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER

    9 employees, $56,530.73 total payroll

  13. DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE

    8 employees, $82,485.82 total payroll

  14. POLICE DEPARTMENT

    7 employees, $212,846.39 total payroll

  15. DEPT OF ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION

    4 employees, $83,894.43 total payroll

  16. OFF OF PAYROLL ADMINISTRATION

    4 employees, $54,591.03 total payroll

  17. DEPARTMENT FOR THE AGING

    3 employees, $109,195.18 total payroll

  18. DEPT OF RECORDS & INFO SERVICE

    3 employees, $17,664.95 total payroll

  19. TECHNOLOGY & INNOVATION

    2 employees, $52,821.57 total payroll

  20. CAMPAIGN FINANCE BOARD

    2 employees, $36,221.02 total payroll

Pay Summary

Rows
768
Average total compensation
$11,038.50
First fiscal year
2014
Last fiscal year
2025

Top Earners By Year

Fiscal Year 2025

  1. KATRINA T CHEN

    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION • $37,469.84

  2. ALEX YU

    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION • $36,222.71

  3. CRISTIAN STATESCU

    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION • $35,546.30

  4. DANIEL BALOCH

    TECHNOLOGY & INNOVATION • $34,556.39

  5. NICK J MELKADZE

    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION • $32,846.83

Fiscal Year 2024

  1. FATIN IFTEKHAR

    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION • $35,874.58

  2. ALEX YU

    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION • $27,068.05

  3. KATRINA T CHEN

    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION • $25,916.22

  4. MICHAEL A ACEVEDO

    POLICE DEPARTMENT • $25,854.25

  5. SHUBHAM MISHRA

    DEPARTMENT OF SANITATION • $24,410.42

Fiscal Year 2023

  1. MICHAEL A ACEVEDO

    POLICE DEPARTMENT • $26,355.93

  2. RAPHAEL M CLIFTON

    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION • $23,684.14

  3. ALEX YU

    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION • $22,405.20

  4. MELISSA RAMIREZ NUNEZ

    OFF OF PAYROLL ADMINISTRATION • $22,138.81

  5. ILYA MOROZOV

    TEACHERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM • $21,634.10

Fiscal Year 2022

  1. JOHNSON YAO

    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION • $33,886.36

  2. MD H ISLAM

    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION • $33,639.90

  3. HERL E COLIN

    TEACHERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM • $22,619.50

  4. JUAN CHEN CHAN

    DEPT OF YOUTH & COMM DEV SRVS • $21,709.60

  5. VISWANATH P MISIR

    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION • $21,381.86

Fiscal Year 2021

  1. CHRISTOPHER SINGH

    DEPT OF HEALTH/MENTAL HYGIENE • $37,435.85

  2. AARON P NG

    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION • $37,265.34

  3. VITALIY KRIL

    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION • $37,254.30

  4. GIAN L SCHECHTER

    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION • $33,601.31

  5. SEAN P CONNOR

    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION • $33,415.07

Fiscal Year 2020

  1. AARON P NG

    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION • $32,575.46

  2. MUHAMMAD N AMIN

    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION • $29,397.80

  3. VITALIY KRIL

    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION • $28,158.48

  4. GIAN L SCHECHTER

    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION • $28,086.81

  5. HYEON J LEE

    POLICE DEPARTMENT • $26,334.49

Source and Caveats

Source for v1: NYC Open Data dataset k397-673e. Raw source rows are preserved as imported.

OT hours before FY2023 are not directly comparable to FY2023 and later because the source methodology changed. Some names, agencies, and other fields may be redacted in the source and are displayed as provided.