NewYorkCityPayroll.com NYC Payroll

Agency

COMMUNITY COLLEGE (BRONX)

Filtered to fiscal year 2014.

Employees

2,032

Rows

2,789

Titles

100

Total Payroll

$69,495,369.08

Fiscal Year Filters

All years FY 2025 FY 2024 FY 2023 FY 2022 FY 2021 FY 2020 FY 2019 FY 2018 FY 2017 FY 2016 FY 2015 FY 2014

Top Earners

  1. LESLIE D ARIAS

    $53,254.68 across 3 records

  2. EDWIN SANCHEZ

    $52,862.37 across 1 record

  3. JOHN G GORE

    $52,786.56 across 1 record

  4. FRANCISCO MOREL

    $52,434.06 across 1 record

  5. ROHAN KENNEDY

    $52,434.06 across 1 record

  6. CECIL MATHURIN

    $52,422.31 across 1 record

  7. MAURICE WILLIAMS

    $52,229.35 across 1 record

  8. FRANCIS GAIZO

    $51,897.87 across 1 record

  9. TONYA LAVETTE JOHNSON

    $51,825.05 across 3 records

  10. NICK KOUNAS

    $51,823.50 across 1 record

  11. IRIS LEFEBRE

    $51,736.88 across 1 record

  12. ROBERT TROISE

    $51,427.35 across 1 record

  13. KELVIN COOPER

    $51,200.88 across 3 records

  14. BERNARD ATKINSON

    $50,953.69 across 1 record

  15. HUGH KEIZS

    $50,953.69 across 1 record

Most Common Titles

  1. COLLEGE ACCOUNTANT

    4 employees, 4 rows

  2. DEAN

    4 employees, 4 rows

  3. PAINTER

    4 employees, 4 rows

  4. CHIEF COLLEGE LAB TECHNICIAN

    3 employees, 3 rows

  5. EOC CUSTODIAL ASSISTANT

    3 employees, 3 rows

  6. EOC LECTURER

    3 employees, 3 rows

  7. LABORER

    3 employees, 3 rows

  8. MAIL/MESSAGE SERVICES WORKER

    3 employees, 3 rows

  9. NON-TEACHING ADJUNCT I

    3 employees, 3 rows

  10. OILER

    3 employees, 3 rows

  11. PLUMBER

    3 employees, 3 rows

  12. SENIOR CUSTODIAL SUPERVISOR

    3 employees, 3 rows

  13. VICE PRESIDENT

    3 employees, 3 rows

  14. ADJUNCT SENIOR COLLEGE LAB TECH

    2 employees, 2 rows

  15. ADMINISTRATOR

    2 employees, 2 rows

Source and Caveats

Source for v1: NYC Open Data dataset k397-673e. Raw source rows are preserved as imported.

OT hours before FY2023 are not directly comparable to FY2023 and later because the source methodology changed. Some names, agencies, and other fields may be redacted in the source and are displayed as provided.