Title

OILER

Employees

507

Agencies

19

Average Base Salary

$638.38

Total Payroll

$409,723,607.52

Agencies Using This Title

  1. DEPT OF ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION

    156 employees, $109,610,701.17 total payroll

  2. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION

    85 employees, $79,037,733.84 total payroll

  3. DEPT OF CITYWIDE ADMIN SVCS

    68 employees, $57,040,557.49 total payroll

  4. POLICE DEPARTMENT

    51 employees, $39,359,466.80 total payroll

  5. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

    36 employees, $30,887,260.37 total payroll

  6. COMMUNITY COLLEGE (MANHATTAN)

    31 employees, $23,336,466.44 total payroll

  7. Police Department

    22 employees, $2,080,840.00 total payroll

  8. DEPT. OF HOMELESS SERVICES

    21 employees, $18,908,840.83 total payroll

  9. HRA/DEPT OF SOCIAL SERVICES

    11 employees, $6,631,443.57 total payroll

  10. COMMUNITY COLLEGE (KINGSBORO)

    11 employees, $2,594,313.50 total payroll

  11. DEPARTMENT OF SANITATION

    10 employees, $6,742,583.65 total payroll

  12. DEPT OF PARKS & RECREATION

    10 employees, $5,493,870.54 total payroll

  13. FIRE DEPARTMENT

    9 employees, $9,032,997.99 total payroll

  14. COMMUNITY COLLEGE (QUEENSBORO)

    9 employees, $1,977,580.74 total payroll

  15. COMMUNITY COLLEGE (BRONX)

    8 employees, $896,371.07 total payroll

  16. DEPT OF HEALTH/MENTAL HYGIENE

    7 employees, $7,206,670.10 total payroll

  17. NYC HOUSING AUTHORITY

    6 employees, $4,810,976.13 total payroll

  18. COMMUNITY COLLEGE (HOSTOS)

    4 employees, $2,800,253.20 total payroll

  19. HUNTER COLLEGE HIGH SCHOOL

    3 employees, $1,274,680.09 total payroll

Pay Summary

Rows
2,883
Average total compensation
$142,117.10
First fiscal year
2014
Last fiscal year
2025

Top Earners By Year

Fiscal Year 2025

  1. ROBERT SECONDINO

    DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION • $396,351.44

  2. GARY A CLEMENTE

    DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION • $375,887.67

  3. KEITH S KMIOTEK

    DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION • $362,026.89

  4. SANDER NACAJ

    DEPT OF HEALTH/MENTAL HYGIENE • $346,430.23

  5. MICHAEL T CHILLO

    DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION • $330,892.71

Fiscal Year 2024

  1. GARY A CLEMENTE

    DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION • $377,886.05

  2. SANDER NACAJ

    DEPT OF HEALTH/MENTAL HYGIENE • $354,868.56

  3. WALTER V KEANE III

    DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION • $344,033.38

  4. ANTHONY BATTISTA

    DEPT OF CITYWIDE ADMIN SVCS • $341,074.02

  5. PAUL P FARRELL

    DEPT OF CITYWIDE ADMIN SVCS • $330,079.12

Fiscal Year 2023

  1. GARY A CLEMENTE

    DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION • $325,365.53

  2. VINCENT P CARUSO

    DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION • $284,973.10

  3. SANDER NACAJ

    DEPT OF HEALTH/MENTAL HYGIENE • $280,813.60

  4. WALTER V KEANE III

    DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION • $279,846.09

  5. ANTHONY BATTISTA

    DEPT OF CITYWIDE ADMIN SVCS • $279,335.24

Fiscal Year 2022

  1. GARY A CLEMENTE

    DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION • $315,328.05

  2. VINCENT P CARUSO

    DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION • $293,945.44

  3. NABIL BENMERZOUK

    DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION • $290,269.72

  4. SANDER NACAJ

    DEPT OF HEALTH/MENTAL HYGIENE • $286,377.73

  5. ANTHONY BATTISTA

    DEPT OF CITYWIDE ADMIN SVCS • $276,987.12

Fiscal Year 2021

  1. GARY A CLEMENTE

    DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION • $289,487.87

  2. MICHAEL P SHERROCK

    DEPT OF HEALTH/MENTAL HYGIENE • $288,846.84

  3. VINCENT P CARUSO

    DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION • $274,627.97

  4. SANDER NACAJ

    DEPT OF HEALTH/MENTAL HYGIENE • $268,352.63

  5. PAUL P FARRELL

    DEPT OF CITYWIDE ADMIN SVCS • $266,293.77

Fiscal Year 2020

  1. ANTHONY BATTISTA

    DEPT OF CITYWIDE ADMIN SVCS • $286,793.07

  2. GARY A CLEMENTE

    DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION • $266,308.35

  3. PAUL P FARRELL

    DEPT OF CITYWIDE ADMIN SVCS • $266,164.40

  4. SANDER NACAJ

    DEPT OF HEALTH/MENTAL HYGIENE • $263,389.47

  5. VINCENT P CARUSO

    DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION • $259,153.93

Source and Caveats

Source for v1: NYC Open Data dataset k397-673e. Raw source rows are preserved as imported.

OT hours before FY2023 are not directly comparable to FY2023 and later because the source methodology changed. Some names, agencies, and other fields may be redacted in the source and are displayed as provided.