Title

SUPERVISING COMPUTER SERVICE TECHNICIAN

Employees

167

Agencies

30

Average Base Salary

$68,945.30

Total Payroll

$63,043,580.42

Agencies Using This Title

  1. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION ADMIN

    73 employees, $30,938,731.05 total payroll

  2. HRA/DEPT OF SOCIAL SERVICES

    16 employees, $3,354,166.60 total payroll

  3. ADMIN FOR CHILDREN'S SVCS

    13 employees, $3,568,929.01 total payroll

  4. DEPT OF HEALTH/MENTAL HYGIENE

    12 employees, $4,595,751.35 total payroll

  5. LAW DEPARTMENT

    9 employees, $3,491,201.25 total payroll

  6. DEPT OF INFO TECH & TELECOMM

    7 employees, $1,070,347.98 total payroll

  7. DEPT OF PARKS & RECREATION

    5 employees, $1,725,046.69 total payroll

  8. NYC HOUSING AUTHORITY

    4 employees, $3,358,228.73 total payroll

  9. DEPARTMENT OF SANITATION

    3 employees, $1,673,172.56 total payroll

  10. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION

    3 employees, $1,593,441.63 total payroll

  11. NYC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS

    3 employees, $1,426,151.95 total payroll

  12. DEPARTMENT OF PROBATION

    3 employees, $1,081,883.19 total payroll

  13. FIRE DEPARTMENT

    2 employees, $814,653.75 total payroll

  14. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

    2 employees, $661,003.64 total payroll

  15. DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE

    2 employees, $281,665.41 total payroll

  16. DEPARTMENT FOR THE AGING

    2 employees, $183,221.43 total payroll

  17. OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER

    1 employee, $918,654.17 total payroll

  18. DISTRICT ATTORNEY-SPECIAL NARC

    1 employee, $497,187.92 total payroll

  19. HOUSING PRESERVATION & DVLPMNT

    1 employee, $372,655.93 total payroll

  20. TECHNOLOGY & INNOVATION

    1 employee, $257,364.62 total payroll

Pay Summary

Rows
830
Average total compensation
$75,956.12
First fiscal year
2014
Last fiscal year
2025

Top Earners By Year

Fiscal Year 2019

  1. ERIK SILER

    DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION ADMIN • $111,131.25

  2. GABOR SZIGETI

    DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION • $97,375.88

  3. KIN FUNG LEUNG

    DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION ADMIN • $93,676.93

  4. RANDY J QUARSHIE

    DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION ADMIN • $92,363.65

  5. GREGORY KEELY

    DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION ADMIN • $92,127.43

Fiscal Year 2018

  1. ERIK SILER

    DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION ADMIN • $118,334.48

  2. SHERIF MIKHAIL

    DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION ADMIN • $100,849.01

  3. MARK LAW

    DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION ADMIN • $96,072.12

  4. DONTAL D JONES

    DEPARTMENT OF SANITATION • $93,083.98

  5. GABOR SZIGETI

    DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION • $90,340.19

Fiscal Year 2017

  1. ERIK SILER

    DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION ADMIN • $111,402.80

  2. SHERIF MIKHAIL

    DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION ADMIN • $96,551.49

  3. GABOR SZIGETI

    DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION • $95,324.37

  4. MARK LAW

    DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION ADMIN • $94,945.65

  5. VANESSA J CAUGHMAN

    ADMIN TRIALS AND HEARINGS • $93,706.13

Fiscal Year 2016

  1. ERIK SILER

    DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION ADMIN • $98,154.21

  2. JOSEPH T ACAMPORA JR

    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION • $93,842.65

  3. GABOR SZIGETI

    DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION • $91,398.99

  4. SHERIF MIKHAIL

    DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION ADMIN • $91,272.70

  5. SI DA LIU

    DEPT OF HEALTH/MENTAL HYGIENE • $90,792.98

Fiscal Year 2015

  1. JOSEPH T ACAMPORA JR

    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION • $132,772.77

  2. WEN HUA XU

    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION • $119,148.89

  3. RICARDO ROSA

    DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION ADMIN • $108,591.42

  4. SONETTE T HANKINS

    LAW DEPARTMENT • $106,026.06

  5. NICHOLAS CHAN

    LAW DEPARTMENT • $102,310.87

Fiscal Year 2014

  1. PETER V RZUCIDLO

    FIRE DEPARTMENT • $120,682.94

  2. JOSEPH T ACAMPORA JR

    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION • $114,934.49

  3. WEN HUA XU

    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION • $112,558.78

  4. NICHOLAS CHAN

    LAW DEPARTMENT • $96,535.55

  5. ERIK SILER

    DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION ADMIN • $93,193.40

Source and Caveats

Source for v1: NYC Open Data dataset k397-673e. Raw source rows are preserved as imported.

OT hours before FY2023 are not directly comparable to FY2023 and later because the source methodology changed. Some names, agencies, and other fields may be redacted in the source and are displayed as provided.