Title

EXECUTIVE AGENCY COUNSEL

Employees

1,574

Agencies

63

Average Base Salary

$143,560.24

Total Payroll

$1,019,193,808.33

Agencies Using This Title

  1. DEPT OF INFO TECH & TELECOMM

    32 employees, $14,009,248.55 total payroll

  2. CONSUMER AFFAIRS

    30 employees, $9,883,156.11 total payroll

  3. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

    29 employees, $21,688,864.96 total payroll

  4. Police Department

    26 employees, $2,990,928.25 total payroll

  5. TAXI & LIMOUSINE COMMISSION

    24 employees, $15,202,687.62 total payroll

  6. OFFICE OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE

    22 employees, $2,433,847.39 total payroll

  7. DEPARTMENT OF SANITATION

    18 employees, $8,814,561.54 total payroll

  8. DEPARTMENT OF PROBATION

    16 employees, $6,864,612.89 total payroll

  9. CONSUMER AND WORKER PROTECTION

    16 employees, $6,383,182.90 total payroll

  10. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST BOARD

    13 employees, $8,801,348.51 total payroll

  11. NYC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS

    13 employees, $5,828,100.93 total payroll

  12. DEPT. OF DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION

    11 employees, $13,806,898.59 total payroll

  13. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS SERV.

    10 employees, $3,249,910.10 total payroll

  14. FINANCIAL INFO SVCS AGENCY

    9 employees, $8,956,461.00 total payroll

  15. DEPT OF YOUTH & COMM DEV SRVS

    9 employees, $4,770,342.14 total payroll

  16. MAYORS OFFICE OF CONTRACT SVCS

    9 employees, $3,858,164.09 total payroll

  17. OFFICE OF LABOR RELATIONS

    8 employees, $4,304,161.15 total payroll

  18. OFFICE OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT

    7 employees, $4,330,082.71 total payroll

  19. CAMPAIGN FINANCE BOARD

    7 employees, $3,467,437.21 total payroll

  20. DEPT. OF HOMELESS SERVICES

    7 employees, $2,249,795.74 total payroll

Pay Summary

Rows
8,268
Average total compensation
$123,269.69
First fiscal year
2014
Last fiscal year
2025

Top Earners By Year

Fiscal Year 2025

  1. LISA A BOVA-HIATT

    NYC HOUSING AUTHORITY • $393,180.31

  2. DAVID D ROHDE

    NYC HOUSING AUTHORITY • $290,900.43

  3. MICHAEL GERBER

    POLICE DEPARTMENT • $276,799.05

  4. ROSEMARIE MALDONADO

    POLICE DEPARTMENT • $275,799.05

  5. DANIEL P GREENE

    NYC HOUSING AUTHORITY • $270,931.29

Fiscal Year 2024

  1. LISA A BOVA-HIATT

    NYC HOUSING AUTHORITY • $406,462.47

  2. DAVID D ROHDE

    NYC HOUSING AUTHORITY • $330,446.39

  3. ROBERT BARROWS

    POLICE DEPARTMENT • $291,239.63

  4. CHAUNCEY G PARKER

    POLICE DEPARTMENT • $290,878.87

  5. JOSEPH V CARDIERI

    ADMIN FOR CHILDREN'S SVCS • $286,888.32

Fiscal Year 2023

  1. LISA A BOVA-HIATT

    NYC HOUSING AUTHORITY • $327,868.54

  2. BEATRICE N THUO

    DEPT OF CITYWIDE ADMIN SVCS • $242,843.02

  3. CHAUNCEY G PARKER

    POLICE DEPARTMENT • $240,455.28

  4. MICHAEL E FITZPATRICK

    TECHNOLOGY & INNOVATION • $240,455.28

  5. LUZ C FONTANA

    TECHNOLOGY & INNOVATION • $240,293.57

Fiscal Year 2022

  1. LISA A BOVA-HIATT

    NYC HOUSING AUTHORITY • $267,189.03

  2. ERNEST F HART

    POLICE DEPARTMENT • $244,150.57

  3. JANINE M GILBERT

    DEPT OF INFO TECH & TELECOMM • $240,656.22

  4. ETHEL H CORCORAN

    DEPT OF INFO TECH & TELECOMM • $237,224.53

  5. TYNIA D RICHARD

    DEPT OF INFO TECH & TELECOMM • $233,149.32

Fiscal Year 2021

  1. LISA A BOVA-HIATT

    NYC HOUSING AUTHORITY • $257,260.30

  2. ERNEST F HART

    POLICE DEPARTMENT • $236,741.96

  3. KEVIN S RICHARDSON

    POLICE DEPARTMENT • $235,818.14

  4. JOHN P BEIRNE

    POLICE DEPARTMENT • $235,818.13

  5. JANINE M GILBERT

    DEPT OF INFO TECH & TELECOMM • $225,828.87

Fiscal Year 2020

  1. JEFFREY R SCHLANGER

    POLICE DEPARTMENT • $240,048.46

  2. JOHN P BEIRNE

    POLICE DEPARTMENT • $237,995.93

  3. ERNEST F HART

    POLICE DEPARTMENT • $237,452.34

  4. KEVIN S RICHARDSON

    POLICE DEPARTMENT • $237,452.34

  5. DAVID M COHEN

    DEPT OF ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION • $232,211.30

Source and Caveats

Source for v1: NYC Open Data dataset k397-673e. Raw source rows are preserved as imported.

OT hours before FY2023 are not directly comparable to FY2023 and later because the source methodology changed. Some names, agencies, and other fields may be redacted in the source and are displayed as provided.