Title

COMPUTER PROGRAMMER ANALYST

Employees

255

Agencies

36

Average Base Salary

$59,269.63

Total Payroll

$51,721,808.49

Agencies Using This Title

  1. DEPT OF ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION

    47 employees, $9,528,349.67 total payroll

  2. DEPT OF INFO TECH & TELECOMM

    47 employees, $7,213,499.74 total payroll

  3. HRA/DEPT OF SOCIAL SERVICES

    20 employees, $3,329,813.67 total payroll

  4. DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE

    19 employees, $4,376,367.49 total payroll

  5. DEPT OF HEALTH/MENTAL HYGIENE

    17 employees, $3,125,903.27 total payroll

  6. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION ADMIN

    14 employees, $4,950,021.63 total payroll

  7. DEPT. OF DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION

    12 employees, $2,368,017.25 total payroll

  8. POLICE DEPARTMENT

    10 employees, $2,319,519.07 total payroll

  9. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

    7 employees, $803,296.23 total payroll

  10. Police Department

    7 employees, $426,692.99 total payroll

  11. ADMIN FOR CHILDREN'S SVCS

    6 employees, $890,803.60 total payroll

  12. OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER

    5 employees, $1,257,026.18 total payroll

  13. HOUSING PRESERVATION & DVLPMNT

    5 employees, $917,177.70 total payroll

  14. TECHNOLOGY & INNOVATION

    5 employees, $487,115.95 total payroll

  15. FINANCIAL INFO SVCS AGENCY

    4 employees, $1,783,416.13 total payroll

  16. DEPT OF CITYWIDE ADMIN SVCS

    4 employees, $874,203.26 total payroll

  17. DEPT OF PARKS & RECREATION

    4 employees, $726,794.65 total payroll

  18. DISTRICT ATTORNEY RICHMOND COU

    3 employees, $780,001.37 total payroll

  19. OFF OF PAYROLL ADMINISTRATION

    3 employees, $765,019.15 total payroll

  20. DEPARTMENT OF CITY PLANNING

    3 employees, $613,290.78 total payroll

Pay Summary

Rows
941
Average total compensation
$54,964.73
First fiscal year
2014
Last fiscal year
2025

Top Earners By Year

Fiscal Year 2019

  1. GARY TANG

    DEPT OF ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION • $93,956.21

  2. ZIAUL SARKER

    DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE • $86,594.27

  3. LUBA HYVAT

    POLICE DEPARTMENT • $86,492.43

  4. HSING-I LEE

    DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE • $86,199.76

  5. MINA MASHREKI

    DEPT OF ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION • $85,833.28

Fiscal Year 2018

  1. GARY TANG

    DEPT OF ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION • $87,602.33

  2. LUBA HYVAT

    POLICE DEPARTMENT • $86,820.15

  3. LEV LEOKUMOVICH

    DISTRICT ATTORNEY KINGS COUNTY • $86,324.24

  4. MINA MASHREKI

    DEPT OF ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION • $83,588.77

  5. ZIAUL SARKER

    DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE • $83,265.15

Fiscal Year 2017

  1. XIAO XUE TANG

    DEPT OF CITYWIDE ADMIN SVCS • $94,399.88

  2. GARY TANG

    DEPT OF ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION • $88,026.93

  3. ZIAUL SARKER

    DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE • $85,244.52

  4. AMRA ALIC

    DEPT OF INFO TECH & TELECOMM • $84,666.62

  5. ALEXANDER FELDMAN

    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION • $84,021.60

Fiscal Year 2016

  1. LINDSAY L MOLLINEAUX

    DEPT OF INFO TECH & TELECOMM • $100,224.88

  2. XIAO XUE TANG

    DEPT OF CITYWIDE ADMIN SVCS • $95,258.35

  3. PIERRE SANON

    DEPT OF INFO TECH & TELECOMM • $80,010.27

  4. ZIAUL SARKER

    DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE • $79,221.71

  5. GARY TANG

    DEPT OF ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION • $78,250.56

Fiscal Year 2015

  1. XIAO XUE TANG

    DEPT OF CITYWIDE ADMIN SVCS • $89,378.66

  2. GARY TANG

    DEPT OF ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION • $85,645.02

  3. VASYL VECHOREK

    DEPT OF ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION • $85,210.83

  4. PIERRE SANON

    DEPT OF INFO TECH & TELECOMM • $82,765.56

  5. TIEN V LE

    DEPARTMENT OF SANITATION • $81,442.96

Fiscal Year 2014

  1. YUAN-CHING CHEN

    DEPT OF ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION • $92,268.60

  2. XIAO XUE TANG

    DEPT OF CITYWIDE ADMIN SVCS • $86,904.37

  3. EDI HERNANDEZ

    DEPT OF ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION • $81,453.61

  4. LEONID V STASKEVICH

    Police Department • $80,604.76

  5. HOA T QUACH

    NYC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS • $76,558.55

Source and Caveats

Source for v1: NYC Open Data dataset k397-673e. Raw source rows are preserved as imported.

OT hours before FY2023 are not directly comparable to FY2023 and later because the source methodology changed. Some names, agencies, and other fields may be redacted in the source and are displayed as provided.