Title

CERTIFIED IT ADMINISTRATOR

Employees

800

Agencies

50

Average Base Salary

$112,874.36

Total Payroll

$603,454,010.21

Agencies Using This Title

  1. TAXI & LIMOUSINE COMMISSION

    8 employees, $3,583,538.60 total payroll

  2. HOUSING PRESERVATION & DVLPMNT

    8 employees, $2,683,108.78 total payroll

  3. DISTRICT ATTORNEY QNS COUNTY

    6 employees, $3,193,323.70 total payroll

  4. FINANCIAL INFO SVCS AGENCY

    6 employees, $1,862,981.45 total payroll

  5. BRONX DISTRICT ATTORNEY

    5 employees, $2,608,818.27 total payroll

  6. DEPT OF YOUTH & COMM DEV SRVS

    5 employees, $2,097,158.19 total payroll

  7. DEPARTMENT OF INVESTIGATION

    5 employees, $839,590.07 total payroll

  8. NYC POLICE PENSION FUND

    4 employees, $3,320,151.51 total payroll

  9. DEPT. OF DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION

    4 employees, $3,299,263.32 total payroll

  10. DEPARTMENT FOR THE AGING

    4 employees, $1,114,258.24 total payroll

  11. CONSUMER AND WORKER PROTECTION

    3 employees, $1,306,258.31 total payroll

  12. OFFICE OF LABOR RELATIONS

    3 employees, $1,123,963.22 total payroll

  13. TEACHERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM

    3 employees, $737,667.11 total payroll

  14. DEPARTMENT OF CITY PLANNING

    2 employees, $1,794,006.37 total payroll

  15. ADMIN TRIALS AND HEARINGS

    2 employees, $1,166,560.93 total payroll

  16. OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER

    2 employees, $1,141,605.75 total payroll

  17. CONSUMER AFFAIRS

    2 employees, $604,249.32 total payroll

  18. Bronx DA

    2 employees, $231,719.06 total payroll

  19. OFFICE OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT

    1 employee, $1,760,487.41 total payroll

  20. CIVILIAN COMPLAINT REVIEW BD

    1 employee, $1,160,074.79 total payroll

Pay Summary

Rows
5,184
Average total compensation
$116,407.02
First fiscal year
2014
Last fiscal year
2025

Top Earners By Year

Fiscal Year 2019

  1. SHARAD SHARMA

    POLICE DEPARTMENT • $186,731.90

  2. HARRELL H PERKINS

    POLICE DEPARTMENT • $186,236.54

  3. YONGLI DUAN

    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION • $184,094.08

  4. SYED A ZAIDI

    DEPARTMENT OF SANITATION • $183,706.64

  5. UMANG SHARMA

    POLICE DEPARTMENT • $182,009.35

Fiscal Year 2018

  1. SLAWOMIR P LYZWA

    DEPARTMENT OF SANITATION • $188,126.33

  2. DAHUNSI ALABI

    DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION ADMIN • $182,899.91

  3. HARRELL H PERKINS

    POLICE DEPARTMENT • $178,315.58

  4. SYED A ZAIDI

    DEPARTMENT OF SANITATION • $177,044.93

  5. KIN WAI LEONG

    DEPT OF INFO TECH & TELECOMM • $175,098.51

Fiscal Year 2017

  1. HANG PAN

    DEPARTMENT OF SANITATION • $187,207.79

  2. SLAWOMIR P LYZWA

    DEPARTMENT OF SANITATION • $186,869.91

  3. YONGLI DUAN

    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION • $176,470.75

  4. SYED A ZAIDI

    DEPARTMENT OF SANITATION • $174,504.65

  5. JUN LI

    HRA/DEPT OF SOCIAL SERVICES • $172,129.30

Fiscal Year 2016

  1. JOSEPH C PALMIERI

    FIRE DEPARTMENT • $173,337.40

  2. HANG PAN

    DEPARTMENT OF SANITATION • $172,536.34

  3. RAJENDRA LOTWALA

    DEPT OF CITYWIDE ADMIN SVCS • $168,573.46

  4. THOMAS FIORE

    DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION • $162,859.67

  5. TERENCE T NEDUMPARAMBIL J

    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION • $158,084.37

Fiscal Year 2015

  1. YONGLI DUAN

    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION • $205,491.34

  2. QUN LIU

    DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION ADMIN • $174,547.31

  3. TERENCE T NEDUMPARAMBIL J

    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION • $174,243.72

  4. RAJENDRA LOTWALA

    DEPT OF CITYWIDE ADMIN SVCS • $170,256.13

  5. DAHUNSI ALABI

    DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION ADMIN • $169,142.56

Fiscal Year 2014

  1. ARTHUR V DIMAYA

    FIRE DEPARTMENT • $190,849.17

  2. YONGLI DUAN

    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION • $190,695.28

  3. RAJENDRA LOTWALA

    DEPT OF CITYWIDE ADMIN SVCS • $173,591.16

  4. TERENCE T NEDUMPARAMBIL J

    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION • $169,754.84

  5. JOMY JOSE

    FIRE DEPARTMENT • $160,680.92

Source and Caveats

Source for v1: NYC Open Data dataset k397-673e. Raw source rows are preserved as imported.

OT hours before FY2023 are not directly comparable to FY2023 and later because the source methodology changed. Some names, agencies, and other fields may be redacted in the source and are displayed as provided.