Agency

TECHNOLOGY & INNOVATION

Employees

2,685

Rows

5,906

Titles

99

Total Payroll

$510,473,624.97

Fiscal Year Filters

Top Earners

  1. DONALD N SUNDERLAND

    $656,367.12 across 3 records

  2. DOMINIC P BERG

    $653,400.43 across 3 records

  3. YOSEF LEHRMAN

    $651,307.54 across 3 records

  4. WILSON SANTIAGO

    $651,074.66 across 3 records

  5. GAIL TANG

    $642,207.25 across 3 records

  6. EBONY S ST. HILAIRE

    $641,955.75 across 3 records

  7. DINA DESIDERIO

    $636,374.01 across 3 records

  8. MICHAEL D MINER

    $622,891.58 across 3 records

  9. PRINCE GUPTA

    $620,469.83 across 3 records

  10. ANDREW PETROV

    $619,339.38 across 3 records

  11. ESTHER V VASA

    $614,574.62 across 3 records

  12. TANESSA A CABE

    $612,562.87 across 3 records

  13. SAMPATH S RENGARAJAN

    $611,286.67 across 3 records

  14. VALENTINO A LEE

    $610,155.31 across 3 records

  15. FARIBORZ AGHILI

    $606,322.99 across 3 records

Most Common Titles

  1. PROGRAM PRODUCER

    9 employees, 26 rows

  2. COLLEGE AIDE

    16 employees, 25 rows

  3. IT INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEER

    11 employees, 25 rows

  4. ADMINISTRATIVE PROCUREMENT ANALYST-NON-MGRL

    10 employees, 25 rows

  5. SENIOR IT ARCHITECT

    10 employees, 23 rows

  6. COMPUTER AIDE-NON-SPVR

    9 employees, 21 rows

  7. SUPERVISOR OF RADIO AND TELEVISION OPERATORS

    7 employees, 19 rows

  8. CITY RESEARCH SCIENTIST

    10 employees, 17 rows

  9. IT AUTOMATION AND MONITORING ENGINEER

    7 employees, 15 rows

  10. ADMINISTRATIVE PUBLIC INFORMATION SPECIALIST

    6 employees, 15 rows

  11. CONFIDENTIAL STRATEGY PLANNER

    8 employees, 14 rows

  12. CLERICAL ASSOCIATE MOST MAYORAL AG

    13 employees, 13 rows

  13. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF IT

    6 employees, 12 rows

  14. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

    5 employees, 12 rows

  15. PROCUREMENT ANALYST

    8 employees, 10 rows

Source and Caveats

Source for v1: NYC Open Data dataset k397-673e. Raw source rows are preserved as imported.

OT hours before FY2023 are not directly comparable to FY2023 and later because the source methodology changed. Some names, agencies, and other fields may be redacted in the source and are displayed as provided.