Agency

POLICE DEPARTMENT

Filtered to fiscal year 2017.

Employees

61,707

Rows

62,516

Titles

245

Total Payroll

$5,317,984,531.31

Fiscal Year Filters

Top Earners

  1. ANTHONY GONZALEZ

    $363,710.16 across 5 records

  2. RAYMOND MARTINEZ

    $359,354.99 across 2 records

  3. PETER R ROSE

    $356,953.43 across 2 records

  4. PETER J QUINN

    $356,490.29 across 2 records

  5. FRANK R SORENSEN

    $347,754.70 across 2 records

  6. DANIEL PEREZ

    $346,999.62 across 3 records

  7. RICHARD RUIZ

    $346,368.77 across 3 records

  8. OSCAR NIEVES

    $344,138.22 across 3 records

  9. JAMES J TAYLOR

    $341,851.80 across 2 records

  10. ERIC RODRIGUEZ

    $340,915.22 across 3 records

  11. JAVIER VALENTIN

    $339,095.18 across 2 records

  12. EDWARD MENDEZ

    $339,008.01 across 3 records

  13. JOSE L RIVERA

    $338,196.57 across 3 records

  14. ANTHONY J RUSSO

    $337,893.89 across 2 records

  15. ANTHONY TORRES

    $337,241.06 across 3 records

Most Common Titles

  1. COUNSEL TO THE POLICE COMMISSIONER

    1 employee, 1 row

  2. CRIMINALIST DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF LABATORY

    1 employee, 1 row

  3. CRIMINALIST DIRECTOR OF LABORATORY

    1 employee, 1 row

  4. DIRECTOR

    1 employee, 1 row

  5. DIRECTOR MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS

    1 employee, 1 row

  6. DIRECTOR OF DEPARTMENT ADVOCATES OFFICE

    1 employee, 1 row

  7. DIRECTOR OF INTERNAL AFFAIRS - PD

    1 employee, 1 row

  8. DIRECTOR OF MOTOR TRANSPORT

    1 employee, 1 row

  9. DIRECTOR OF PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES-PD

    1 employee, 1 row

  10. DIRECTOR OF SUPPORT SERVICES-PD

    1 employee, 1 row

  11. DIRECTOR OF TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT-PD

    1 employee, 1 row

  12. DIRECTOR OF TRAINING

    1 employee, 1 row

  13. ECONOMIST

    1 employee, 1 row

  14. EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM SPECIALIST

    1 employee, 1 row

  15. FIRST DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

    1 employee, 1 row

Source and Caveats

Source for v1: NYC Open Data dataset k397-673e. Raw source rows are preserved as imported.

OT hours before FY2023 are not directly comparable to FY2023 and later because the source methodology changed. Some names, agencies, and other fields may be redacted in the source and are displayed as provided.