Agency

POLICE DEPARTMENT

Filtered to fiscal year 2015.

Employees

58,502

Rows

59,264

Titles

239

Total Payroll

$4,595,729,044.43

Fiscal Year Filters

Top Earners

  1. JAMES N MCCARTHY

    $204,017.76 across 1 record

  2. BRENDAN J GALLAGHER

    $203,791.71 across 1 record

  3. CHRISTIAN A QUEZADA

    $203,676.02 across 2 records

  4. CHARLES M SCHOLL

    $203,534.20 across 1 record

  5. JAMES J HANVEY

    $203,533.06 across 1 record

  6. NEIL J POLIS

    $203,530.63 across 1 record

  7. MARK C LANIGAN

    $203,403.84 across 1 record

  8. ROBERT S MARTINEZ

    $203,187.53 across 1 record

  9. WILLIAM ORTIZ

    $203,137.06 across 2 records

  10. WILLIAM AUBRY

    $203,098.77 across 1 record

  11. WILLIAM J MATUSIAK

    $203,061.96 across 1 record

  12. JOHN S SCHNEIDER

    $202,952.01 across 1 record

  13. THOMAS MORAN

    $202,829.66 across 1 record

  14. WILLIAM L DEMPSEY

    $202,817.11 across 1 record

  15. JOHN ROGAN

    $202,734.71 across 1 record

Most Common Titles

  1. CRIMINALIST ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF LABORATORY

    6 employees, 6 rows

  2. PRECINCT COMMUNITY RELATIONS AIDE

    6 employees, 6 rows

  3. PRINCIPAL FINGERPRINT TECHNICIAN

    6 employees, 6 rows

  4. ADMINISTRATIVE PROCUREMENT ANALYST

    5 employees, 5 rows

  5. ASSOCIATE PROJECT MANAGER

    5 employees, 5 rows

  6. CASHIER

    5 employees, 5 rows

  7. CERTIFIED IT DEVELOPER

    5 employees, 5 rows

  8. DEPUTY CHIEF SURGEON

    5 employees, 5 rows

  9. POLICE OFFICER, SPECIAL ASSIGNMENT

    5 employees, 5 rows

  10. SHEET METAL WORKER

    5 employees, 5 rows

  11. STENOGRAPHER TO EACH DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

    5 employees, 5 rows

  12. SUPERVISOR ELECTRICIAN

    5 employees, 5 rows

  13. THERMOSTAT REPAIRER

    5 employees, 5 rows

  14. ADMINISTRATIVE PROJECT MANAGER

    4 employees, 4 rows

  15. *ADM SCHOOL SECURITY MANAGER-U

    4 employees, 4 rows

Source and Caveats

Source for v1: NYC Open Data dataset k397-673e. Raw source rows are preserved as imported.

OT hours before FY2023 are not directly comparable to FY2023 and later because the source methodology changed. Some names, agencies, and other fields may be redacted in the source and are displayed as provided.