Agency

OFFICE OF LABOR RELATIONS

Employees

384

Rows

1,979

Titles

59

Total Payroll

$140,120,491.68

Fiscal Year Filters

Top Earners

  1. EBONIE R BROWN

    $503,491.37 across 8 records

  2. PHYLLIS ABRAHAM

    $498,275.95 across 9 records

  3. ANNA T TAN

    $487,980.22 across 6 records

  4. CLAUDIA CRUSCO

    $485,284.78 across 9 records

  5. GAIL M ROWAN

    $480,387.57 across 6 records

  6. DIANE YOVINO

    $468,038.82 across 11 records

  7. ANNE M SHANER

    $463,030.37 across 8 records

  8. BIADNA LORQUET

    $460,440.60 across 11 records

  9. MIGUEL CRUZ

    $456,937.13 across 12 records

  10. CATHERINE FOWLES

    $428,817.72 across 11 records

  11. CARMEN L GUTIERREZ

    $423,475.73 across 10 records

  12. MONTE NOWENSTEIN

    $421,820.94 across 6 records

  13. IMO-JAH A DESOUZA

    $418,673.04 across 7 records

  14. ALAN H MAJEROL

    $406,291.02 across 6 records

  15. ANNABELLE R HECKLER

    $405,818.68 across 5 records

Most Common Titles

  1. CLERICAL ASSOCIATE MOST MAYORAL AG

    12 employees, 12 rows

  2. SECRETARY TO THE COMMISSIONER OF LABOR RELATIONS

    3 employees, 12 rows

  3. ASSOCIATE COUNSEL

    2 employees, 12 rows

  4. CUSTOMER INFORMATION REPRESENTATIVE MA L 1549

    2 employees, 12 rows

  5. TESTS AND MEASUREMENT SPECIALIST

    1 employee, 12 rows

  6. COMPUTER ASSOCIATE

    5 employees, 11 rows

  7. DIRECTOR

    2 employees, 11 rows

  8. CERTIFIED IT ADMINISTRATOR

    3 employees, 10 rows

  9. LABOR RELATIONS ANALYST TRAINEE

    5 employees, 9 rows

  10. COUNSEL

    2 employees, 9 rows

  11. SUPERVISOR OF OFFICE MACHINE OPERATIONS

    1 employee, 9 rows

  12. ADMINISTRATIVE PUBLIC INFORMATION SPECIALIST

    3 employees, 7 rows

  13. AGENCY CHIEF CONTRACTING OFFICER

    2 employees, 7 rows

  14. ADMIN COMMUNITY RELATIONS SPECIALIST

    1 employee, 7 rows

  15. BOOKKEEPER

    3 employees, 6 rows

Source and Caveats

Source for v1: NYC Open Data dataset k397-673e. Raw source rows are preserved as imported.

OT hours before FY2023 are not directly comparable to FY2023 and later because the source methodology changed. Some names, agencies, and other fields may be redacted in the source and are displayed as provided.