Agency

OFFICE OF LABOR RELATIONS

Filtered to fiscal year 2020.

Employees

176

Rows

176

Titles

36

Total Payroll

$12,143,290.86

Fiscal Year Filters

Top Earners

  1. MISTY N SMITH

    $70,210.22 across 1 record

  2. IMO-JAH A DESOUZA

    $69,470.76 across 1 record

  3. MAI H CHAU

    $69,138.23 across 1 record

  4. VICTORIA S GOOD

    $68,317.79 across 1 record

  5. JUDITH FRANCIS

    $67,639.38 across 1 record

  6. SADIYYA ABDUL-KARIM

    $67,111.65 across 1 record

  7. BASIA WOLFF

    $67,075.42 across 1 record

  8. XIOMARA D ATKINSON

    $66,270.02 across 1 record

  9. CLAUDIA CRUSCO

    $65,965.16 across 1 record

  10. PABLO TORRES JR. JR

    $65,932.74 across 1 record

  11. PHYLLIS ABRAHAM

    $64,698.89 across 1 record

  12. MAY W WONG

    $63,705.46 across 1 record

  13. ANNE M SHANER

    $63,362.93 across 1 record

  14. EUN HYE LEE

    $62,955.87 across 1 record

  15. ARTHUR ALTBERGER

    $62,814.60 across 1 record

Most Common Titles

  1. COMMUNITY COORDINATOR

    28 employees, 28 rows

  2. COMMUNITY ASSOCIATE

    22 employees, 22 rows

  3. PRINCIPAL ADMINISTRATIVE ASSOCIATE - NON SUPVR

    15 employees, 15 rows

  4. CITY RESEARCH SCIENTIST

    13 employees, 13 rows

  5. COMMUNITY ASSISTANT

    10 employees, 10 rows

  6. DEPUTY ASSISTANT COUNSEL

    10 employees, 10 rows

  7. CLERICAL ASSOCIATE

    9 employees, 9 rows

  8. LABOR RELATIONS ANALYST

    9 employees, 9 rows

  9. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF LABOR RELATIONS

    8 employees, 8 rows

  10. ADMINISTRATIVE LABOR RELATIONS ANALYST

    7 employees, 7 rows

  11. EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM SPECIALIST

    5 employees, 5 rows

  12. ADMINISTRATIVE MANAGER

    4 employees, 4 rows

  13. ACCOUNTANT

    3 employees, 3 rows

  14. ASSOCIATE STAFF ANALYST

    3 employees, 3 rows

  15. AGENCY ATTORNEY

    2 employees, 2 rows

Source and Caveats

Source for v1: NYC Open Data dataset k397-673e. Raw source rows are preserved as imported.

OT hours before FY2023 are not directly comparable to FY2023 and later because the source methodology changed. Some names, agencies, and other fields may be redacted in the source and are displayed as provided.