Agency

OFFICE OF LABOR RELATIONS

Filtered to fiscal year 2021.

Employees

161

Rows

161

Titles

35

Total Payroll

$12,780,080.13

Fiscal Year Filters

Top Earners

  1. WILLIAM J RAUBA

    $104,395.78 across 1 record

  2. DAVID L WOLFE JR.

    $101,914.42 across 1 record

  3. MARISSA A DONOVAN

    $98,126.37 across 1 record

  4. CATHERINE D YEADON

    $97,989.58 across 1 record

  5. NELI I QUINCHE

    $95,700.08 across 1 record

  6. ROSEANN S AMENGUAL

    $93,173.89 across 1 record

  7. JOAN BARROW

    $91,320.40 across 1 record

  8. MEENA J PATEL

    $91,116.71 across 1 record

  9. LINDA R FORD

    $90,500.35 across 1 record

  10. TAMARA F LUBANSKY

    $89,859.36 across 1 record

  11. REY CORTEZ

    $89,782.81 across 1 record

  12. PAMELA THOMAS

    $89,304.76 across 1 record

  13. AYANA MBONU

    $86,593.96 across 1 record

  14. KAM K CHOW

    $85,891.25 across 1 record

  15. VANESSA L WALTON

    $85,514.50 across 1 record

Most Common Titles

  1. COMMUNITY COORDINATOR

    27 employees, 27 rows

  2. COMMUNITY ASSOCIATE

    21 employees, 21 rows

  3. CITY RESEARCH SCIENTIST

    13 employees, 13 rows

  4. PRINCIPAL ADMINISTRATIVE ASSOCIATE - NON SUPVR

    13 employees, 13 rows

  5. CLERICAL ASSOCIATE

    9 employees, 9 rows

  6. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF LABOR RELATIONS

    8 employees, 8 rows

  7. COMMUNITY ASSISTANT

    8 employees, 8 rows

  8. DEPUTY ASSISTANT COUNSEL

    7 employees, 7 rows

  9. LABOR RELATIONS ANALYST

    7 employees, 7 rows

  10. ADMINISTRATIVE LABOR RELATIONS ANALYST

    6 employees, 6 rows

  11. ADMINISTRATIVE MANAGER

    4 employees, 4 rows

  12. EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM SPECIALIST

    4 employees, 4 rows

  13. ACCOUNTANT

    3 employees, 3 rows

  14. ASSOCIATE STAFF ANALYST

    3 employees, 3 rows

  15. AGENCY ATTORNEY

    2 employees, 2 rows

Source and Caveats

Source for v1: NYC Open Data dataset k397-673e. Raw source rows are preserved as imported.

OT hours before FY2023 are not directly comparable to FY2023 and later because the source methodology changed. Some names, agencies, and other fields may be redacted in the source and are displayed as provided.