Agency

OFFICE OF LABOR RELATIONS

Employees

384

Rows

1,979

Titles

59

Total Payroll

$140,120,491.68

Fiscal Year Filters

Top Earners

  1. RACHEL N EISENMAN

    $185,859.43 across 3 records

  2. KEVON M GORHAM

    $185,140.39 across 3 records

  3. MATTHEW I KANTOR

    $184,377.69 across 3 records

  4. NICHOLAS R KHAN

    $181,418.50 across 4 records

  5. JACQUELINE R SCOTT

    $180,962.49 across 4 records

  6. DIONNE J DUBLIN

    $180,889.09 across 3 records

  7. DANIEL DENG

    $180,066.74 across 4 records

  8. AQUAYA S PERRY

    $179,111.17 across 3 records

  9. JEAN N BREWER

    $177,745.38 across 1 record

  10. KACI L HILL

    $177,092.03 across 4 records

  11. IAN G WILLIAMS

    $176,956.15 across 5 records

  12. EMILY KASTNER

    $170,333.00 across 4 records

  13. SHAKIMA L STEVENS

    $169,879.70 across 4 records

  14. NIEN CHING LIN

    $169,002.88 across 3 records

  15. SANTOS ARROYO III

    $168,946.36 across 4 records

Most Common Titles

  1. ACCOUNTANT

    9 employees, 44 rows

  2. ASSOCIATE STAFF ANALYST

    7 employees, 44 rows

  3. ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF ANALYST

    9 employees, 39 rows

  4. EXECUTIVE AGENCY COUNSEL

    8 employees, 31 rows

  5. SECRETARY

    5 employees, 30 rows

  6. ASSISTANT RETIREMENT BENEFITS EXAMINER

    11 employees, 27 rows

  7. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF LABOR RELATIONS

    5 employees, 26 rows

  8. STAFF ANALYST

    7 employees, 23 rows

  9. COMPUTER SYSTEMS MANAGER

    3 employees, 22 rows

  10. COMPUTER SPECIALIST

    2 employees, 21 rows

  11. ADM MANAGER-NON-MGRL

    6 employees, 20 rows

  12. AGENCY ATTORNEY

    2 employees, 19 rows

  13. ASSOCIATE LABOR RELATIONS ANALYST

    4 employees, 16 rows

  14. COMMISSIONER OF LABOR RELATIONS

    3 employees, 14 rows

  15. EMPLOYEE HEALTH BENEFITS PROGRAM DIRECTOR

    2 employees, 13 rows

Source and Caveats

Source for v1: NYC Open Data dataset k397-673e. Raw source rows are preserved as imported.

OT hours before FY2023 are not directly comparable to FY2023 and later because the source methodology changed. Some names, agencies, and other fields may be redacted in the source and are displayed as provided.