Agency

DISTRICT ATTORNEY-MANHATTAN

Employees

5,569

Rows

22,002

Titles

92

Total Payroll

$1,464,418,032.64

Fiscal Year Filters

Top Earners

  1. BROOKE A LAWRENCE

    $56,463.14 across 2 records

  2. JACOB E GOLDFISCHER

    $56,451.20 across 2 records

  3. ITA PARNASS

    $56,383.54 across 1 record

  4. CAITLIN E RUBIN

    $56,299.30 across 3 records

  5. STEPHEN F KARDIAN

    $56,141.29 across 2 records

  6. NATHAN T ROBINSON

    $56,118.98 across 1 record

  7. WILLIAM L ENGELMAYER

    $56,081.19 across 2 records

  8. ALEXANDRA E KIRK

    $56,018.23 across 2 records

  9. MARCELO A TRIANA

    $55,999.92 across 2 records

  10. AVERY Z RANSOM

    $55,977.78 across 1 record

  11. BRYAN SERINO

    $55,938.39 across 1 record

  12. ALFREDO D LUNA

    $55,895.19 across 2 records

  13. LORANCY A JEAN

    $55,893.26 across 1 record

  14. LAUREN E SCOTT

    $55,764.47 across 1 record

  15. MARIA PUKHOVSKAYA

    $55,709.01 across 2 records

Most Common Titles

  1. CHIEF OFFICE ASSISTANT

    1 employee, 3 rows

  2. COMMUNITY SERVICE AIDE

    2 employees, 2 rows

  3. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INFORMATION

    2 employees, 2 rows

  4. ADVISOR FOR GAY, LESBIAN, TRANSGENDER ISSUES

    1 employee, 2 rows

  5. CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

    1 employee, 2 rows

  6. CITY RESEARCH SCIENTIST

    1 employee, 2 rows

  7. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF COMMUNICATIONS

    1 employee, 2 rows

  8. DIRECTOR OF COMMUNICATIONS

    1 employee, 2 rows

  9. DIRECTOR OF CRIME STRATEGIES AND ANALYSIS

    1 employee, 2 rows

  10. DIR OF INVESTIGATIVE ACCTNG AND ECONOMIC CRIMES INVSTNGS

    1 employee, 2 rows

  11. STAFF ANALYST TRAINEE

    1 employee, 2 rows

  12. SUPERVISOR CARPENTER

    1 employee, 2 rows

  13. ADMINISTRATION PUBLIC RECORD OFFICER

    1 employee, 1 row

  14. ADMINISTRATIVE ARCHITECT

    1 employee, 1 row

  15. ASSOCIATE LABOR RELATIONS ANALYST

    1 employee, 1 row

Source and Caveats

Source for v1: NYC Open Data dataset k397-673e. Raw source rows are preserved as imported.

OT hours before FY2023 are not directly comparable to FY2023 and later because the source methodology changed. Some names, agencies, and other fields may be redacted in the source and are displayed as provided.