Agency

DEPT OF PARKS & RECREATION

Employees

62,640

Rows

183,750

Titles

198

Total Payroll

$5,055,044,379.72

Fiscal Year Filters

Top Earners

  1. JOSE DIAZ

    $1,139,806.02 across 20 records

  2. TIMOTHY JACQUES

    $1,138,550.83 across 12 records

  3. ARACELIS ROMAN

    $1,138,262.20 across 12 records

  4. JEFFREY B EDUSEI

    $1,137,530.06 across 12 records

  5. ROBIN WICKERT

    $1,137,117.21 across 12 records

  6. MATTHEW GENRICH

    $1,137,046.65 across 12 records

  7. IMTAZ P ODIE

    $1,136,928.20 across 12 records

  8. CHRISTOPHER ACOSTA

    $1,136,641.93 across 12 records

  9. PATRICK J HORAN

    $1,136,241.09 across 12 records

  10. YEUK CHUNG NG

    $1,134,748.31 across 12 records

  11. NAHN TSENG

    $1,134,712.09 across 12 records

  12. FRANCO MUCCIACCIARO

    $1,134,696.96 across 12 records

  13. JORGE G CISNEROS

    $1,134,378.35 across 12 records

  14. RALPH VIALET

    $1,134,358.63 across 12 records

  15. WILLIAM M LEIGH

    $1,134,300.95 across 11 records

Most Common Titles

  1. JOB TRAINING PARTICIPANT

    38,743 employees, 68,225 rows

  2. CITY SEASONAL AIDE

    7,814 employees, 21,536 rows

  3. CITY PARK WORKER

    5,879 employees, 18,641 rows

  4. LIFE GUARD

    3,130 employees, 10,834 rows

  5. PARK SUPERVISOR

    1,116 employees, 5,665 rows

  6. COMMUNITY COORDINATOR

    1,335 employees, 5,354 rows

  7. URBAN PARK RANGER

    1,593 employees, 4,792 rows

  8. ASSOCIATE PARK SERVICE WORKER

    1,134 employees, 4,370 rows

  9. LIFEGUARD

    1,693 employees, 3,754 rows

  10. RECREATION SPECIALIST

    952 employees, 3,035 rows

  11. PLAYGROUND ASSOCIATE

    1,333 employees, 3,030 rows

  12. COMMUNITY ASSOCIATE

    879 employees, 2,466 rows

  13. GARDENER

    560 employees, 2,369 rows

  14. RECREATION SUPERVISOR

    374 employees, 1,630 rows

  15. ASSOCIATE URBAN PARK RANGER

    451 employees, 1,449 rows

Source and Caveats

Source for v1: NYC Open Data dataset k397-673e. Raw source rows are preserved as imported.

OT hours before FY2023 are not directly comparable to FY2023 and later because the source methodology changed. Some names, agencies, and other fields may be redacted in the source and are displayed as provided.