Agency

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION

Employees

23,218

Rows

146,934

Titles

224

Total Payroll

$13,387,135,226.95

Fiscal Year Filters

Top Earners

  1. JASMINE S RICHARDSON

    $2,286,825.44 across 12 records

  2. JONATHAN N RICHARDS

    $2,285,055.08 across 12 records

  3. RONALD R RUDOLPH

    $2,283,156.92 across 12 records

  4. YUPENG CAI

    $2,282,312.46 across 12 records

  5. CHARLES DAVIS

    $2,280,458.30 across 12 records

  6. GIOVANNI PROVENZANO

    $2,278,122.15 across 12 records

  7. MICHAEL T MCDONAGH

    $2,277,744.40 across 9 records

  8. LAKISHA S PARKER

    $2,276,828.82 across 12 records

  9. SUBHAS C SANKAR

    $2,275,715.98 across 11 records

  10. ISHWAR N MEGNATH

    $2,273,389.06 across 9 records

  11. ALASON HENRY

    $2,272,296.72 across 12 records

  12. DANIEL K LAKE

    $2,267,140.21 across 11 records

  13. SHERRIE REMBERT

    $2,264,915.39 across 12 records

  14. VLAJEMY FRANCOIS

    $2,264,648.08 across 12 records

  15. RUSSELL LEE

    $2,261,564.05 across 12 records

Most Common Titles

  1. PROJECT MANAGER

    1 employee, 5 rows

  2. CONTRACT SPECIALIST

    2 employees, 4 rows

  3. SENIOR DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

    2 employees, 3 rows

  4. SENIOR IT ARCHITECT

    2 employees, 3 rows

  5. ASSISTANT LAUNDRY SUPERVISOR

    1 employee, 3 rows

  6. ASSISTANT PRINTING PRESS OPERATOR

    1 employee, 3 rows

  7. ASSOCIATE QUALITY ASSURANCE SPECIALIST

    1 employee, 3 rows

  8. COMPUTER SERVICE TECHNICIAN

    1 employee, 3 rows

  9. IT PROJECT SPECIALIST

    1 employee, 3 rows

  10. ACCOUNTANT

    2 employees, 2 rows

  11. AGENCY ATTORNEY INTERN

    2 employees, 2 rows

  12. ADMINISTRATION PUBLIC RECORD OFFICER

    1 employee, 2 rows

  13. ADMINISTRATIVE INSPECTOR

    1 employee, 2 rows

  14. ASSOCIATE CONTRACT SPECIALIST

    1 employee, 2 rows

  15. CHIEF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OFFICER

    1 employee, 2 rows

Source and Caveats

Source for v1: NYC Open Data dataset k397-673e. Raw source rows are preserved as imported.

OT hours before FY2023 are not directly comparable to FY2023 and later because the source methodology changed. Some names, agencies, and other fields may be redacted in the source and are displayed as provided.