Agency

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION

Employees

23,218

Rows

146,934

Titles

224

Total Payroll

$13,387,135,226.95

Fiscal Year Filters

Top Earners

  1. RENEE ACKERMAN

    $429,991.54 across 6 records

  2. TIMOTHY EDMUND

    $429,785.21 across 9 records

  3. SONIA G MESTRE

    $429,760.88 across 5 records

  4. GILES J FERRELL

    $429,750.18 across 5 records

  5. CRYSTAL VENTURA

    $429,615.43 across 5 records

  6. DERRICK PEREZ

    $429,589.48 across 9 records

  7. GARDNER ROBINSON

    $429,572.34 across 8 records

  8. LISA DAGOSTINO

    $429,134.72 across 8 records

  9. TRUDIE L MONTEFORTE

    $429,125.54 across 6 records

  10. JESUS MARTINEZ

    $429,070.65 across 13 records

  11. RAYNIERICK VALDEZ

    $429,054.00 across 9 records

  12. ALCIDNEA KNUPP

    $428,902.54 across 7 records

  13. JOHN PENAFIEL

    $428,876.89 across 8 records

  14. EDMUND D WALLACE II

    $428,633.70 across 4 records

  15. MOLENAUX PARKER

    $428,589.87 across 9 records

Most Common Titles

  1. SENIOR INSTITUTIONAL TRADES INSTRUCTOR

    4 employees, 25 rows

  2. TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATE

    4 employees, 25 rows

  3. ASSOCIATE COMMISSIONER

    13 employees, 24 rows

  4. ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS PROMOTION COORDINATOR

    7 employees, 24 rows

  5. OFFICE MACHINE AIDE

    5 employees, 24 rows

  6. ASBESTOS HANDLER SUPERVISOR

    3 employees, 23 rows

  7. WARDEN-DEPUTY WARDEN IN COMM

    17 employees, 22 rows

  8. INDUSTRIAL HYGIENIST

    7 employees, 22 rows

  9. MARINE OILER

    3 employees, 22 rows

  10. SUPERVISING HOUSEKEEPER

    3 employees, 22 rows

  11. CITY ELEVATOR OPERATOR

    5 employees, 21 rows

  12. ADMINISTRATIVE SUPERVISOR OF BUILDING MAINTENANCE

    3 employees, 21 rows

  13. GRAPHIC ARTIST

    3 employees, 21 rows

  14. COMMISSIONER

    6 employees, 20 rows

  15. SUPERVISING COMPUTER SERVICE TECHNICIAN

    3 employees, 20 rows

Source and Caveats

Source for v1: NYC Open Data dataset k397-673e. Raw source rows are preserved as imported.

OT hours before FY2023 are not directly comparable to FY2023 and later because the source methodology changed. Some names, agencies, and other fields may be redacted in the source and are displayed as provided.