Agency

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION

Employees

23,218

Rows

146,934

Titles

224

Total Payroll

$13,387,135,226.95

Fiscal Year Filters

Top Earners

  1. SHASEANNIA D PITTMAN

    $1,105,930.05 across 10 records

  2. ELAINE BAEZ

    $1,105,765.22 across 12 records

  3. JAMELL J MOORE

    $1,105,753.99 across 10 records

  4. RONALD B SMITH

    $1,105,561.89 across 11 records

  5. SHORNETT ERSKINE

    $1,105,525.28 across 10 records

  6. DIONNE N HOGAN

    $1,105,507.29 across 9 records

  7. CHRISTOPHER OGHAYORE

    $1,105,437.46 across 9 records

  8. RICHARD UBER

    $1,105,118.68 across 11 records

  9. MARK BRISTOW

    $1,105,020.58 across 9 records

  10. KHALEEQ JENKINS

    $1,104,988.13 across 9 records

  11. DAVID KAIM

    $1,104,974.42 across 8 records

  12. SHATRONA SCOTT

    $1,104,841.94 across 12 records

  13. ENRIQUE VASQUEZ

    $1,104,801.37 across 9 records

  14. SHERIFA THOMAS

    $1,104,495.72 across 9 records

  15. MICHELE A CLIFFORD

    $1,104,492.96 across 6 records

Most Common Titles

  1. ADMINISTRATIVE PUBLIC RECORDS OFFICER

    2 employees, 10 rows

  2. BOOKKEEPER

    1 employee, 10 rows

  3. PAINTER

    5 employees, 9 rows

  4. ADMINISTRATIVE CONTRACT SPECIALIST

    4 employees, 9 rows

  5. AGENCY CHIEF CONTRACTING OFFICER

    3 employees, 9 rows

  6. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS

    3 employees, 9 rows

  7. TELEPHONE SERVICE TECHNICIAN

    3 employees, 9 rows

  8. ADMINISTRATIVE GRAPHIC ARTIST

    2 employees, 9 rows

  9. SECRETARY TO THE COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

    2 employees, 9 rows

  10. SUPERVISOR ELECTRICIAN

    2 employees, 9 rows

  11. MATE

    1 employee, 9 rows

  12. SUPERINTENDENT OF LAUNDRIES

    1 employee, 9 rows

  13. SUPERVISOR OF ELECTRICAL INSTALLATIONS & MAINTENANCE

    1 employee, 9 rows

  14. *ATTORNEY AT LAW

    4 employees, 8 rows

  15. QUALITY ASSURANCE SPECIALIST

    3 employees, 8 rows

Source and Caveats

Source for v1: NYC Open Data dataset k397-673e. Raw source rows are preserved as imported.

OT hours before FY2023 are not directly comparable to FY2023 and later because the source methodology changed. Some names, agencies, and other fields may be redacted in the source and are displayed as provided.