Agency

DEPARTMENT OF BUILDINGS

Employees

4,223

Rows

21,897

Titles

133

Total Payroll

$1,489,580,869.87

Fiscal Year Filters

Top Earners

  1. LUZ GONZALEZ

    $661,096.73 across 12 records

  2. PIERRE R COLAS

    $660,505.03 across 10 records

  3. MARTIN RAMOS

    $659,806.54 across 12 records

  4. LARISA KOROL

    $659,748.79 across 9 records

  5. DESIRE L LEE

    $659,149.94 across 7 records

  6. RACHID MADA

    $658,696.21 across 9 records

  7. MARGUERITE BARIL

    $658,183.33 across 8 records

  8. KEVIN P CASSIDY

    $657,389.47 across 10 records

  9. SERGIY MOTORIN

    $657,329.04 across 8 records

  10. ANURUPA A PATEL

    $655,362.73 across 9 records

  11. BEVERLY CRANDON-HUTSON

    $655,025.99 across 12 records

  12. MUNESHWAR PERSAUD

    $652,178.29 across 10 records

  13. DAVID E LOUIS

    $651,556.00 across 6 records

  14. ARKADIY LEVI

    $650,149.10 across 7 records

  15. MYROSLAV HRABOVSKY

    $650,036.30 across 10 records

Most Common Titles

  1. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY OFFICER

    2 employees, 9 rows

  2. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT

    1 employee, 9 rows

  3. SAFETY SPECIALIST

    2 employees, 8 rows

  4. SENIOR ESTIMATOR

    1 employee, 8 rows

  5. LABOR RELATIONS ANALYST

    4 employees, 7 rows

  6. ADMINISTRATION PUBLIC RECORD OFFICER

    2 employees, 7 rows

  7. RESEARCH ASSISTANT

    2 employees, 7 rows

  8. COMPUTER OPERATIONS MANAGER

    1 employee, 7 rows

  9. IT SECURITY SPECIALIST

    3 employees, 6 rows

  10. ASSOCIATE PUBLIC RECORDS OFFICER

    2 employees, 6 rows

  11. COMPUTER SERVICE TECHNICIAN

    2 employees, 6 rows

  12. ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN

    2 employees, 6 rows

  13. FIRST DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

    2 employees, 6 rows

  14. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER FOR LABOR RELATIONS & ADMIN

    1 employee, 6 rows

  15. ASSOCIATE PUBLIC INFORMATION SPECIALIST

    1 employee, 6 rows

Source and Caveats

Source for v1: NYC Open Data dataset k397-673e. Raw source rows are preserved as imported.

OT hours before FY2023 are not directly comparable to FY2023 and later because the source methodology changed. Some names, agencies, and other fields may be redacted in the source and are displayed as provided.