NewYorkCityPayroll.com NYC Payroll

Agency

DEPARTMENT FOR THE AGING

Filtered to fiscal year 2022.

Employees

879

Rows

879

Titles

53

Total Payroll

$29,680,129.90

Fiscal Year Filters

All years FY 2025 FY 2024 FY 2023 FY 2022 FY 2021 FY 2020 FY 2019 FY 2018 FY 2017 FY 2016 FY 2015 FY 2014

Top Earners

  1. CHONG OI KUONG

    $1,856.25 across 1 record

  2. BAO Y WANG

    $1,854.00 across 1 record

  3. BING NAN ZHU

    $1,854.00 across 1 record

  4. BI YING LI

    $1,854.00 across 1 record

  5. CAI X HE

    $1,854.00 across 1 record

  6. CHAM CHAN

    $1,854.00 across 1 record

  7. CUN JI ZHENG

    $1,854.00 across 1 record

  8. JIN QING ZENG

    $1,854.00 across 1 record

  9. JINYAO PENG

    $1,854.00 across 1 record

  10. KA KUI LI

    $1,854.00 across 1 record

  11. LU WAH YU

    $1,854.00 across 1 record

  12. MIAO ZHEN WANG

    $1,854.00 across 1 record

  13. MOO NAR CHANG GEE

    $1,854.00 across 1 record

  14. MUZHEN CHEN

    $1,854.00 across 1 record

  15. QIAN YUAN YU

    $1,854.00 across 1 record

Most Common Titles

  1. COMPUTER SPECIALIST

    5 employees, 5 rows

  2. SUPERVISOR III

    5 employees, 5 rows

  3. ACCOUNTANT

    4 employees, 4 rows

  4. ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTOR OF SOCIAL SERVICES

    4 employees, 4 rows

  5. CITY RESEARCH SCIENTIST

    4 employees, 4 rows

  6. ADMINISTRATIVE PROCUREMENT ANALYST-NON-MGRL

    3 employees, 3 rows

  7. PRINCIPAL NUTRITION CONSULTANT

    3 employees, 3 rows

  8. SUPERVISOR II

    3 employees, 3 rows

  9. ADMIN COMMUNITY RELATIONS SPECIALIST

    2 employees, 2 rows

  10. ADM MANAGER-NON-MGRL

    2 employees, 2 rows

  11. ASSISTANT ARCHITECT

    2 employees, 2 rows

  12. CERTIFIED IT DEVELOPER

    2 employees, 2 rows

  13. EXECUTIVE AGENCY COUNSEL

    2 employees, 2 rows

  14. SECRETARY

    2 employees, 2 rows

  15. STAFF ANALYST

    2 employees, 2 rows

Source and Caveats

Source for v1: NYC Open Data dataset k397-673e. Raw source rows are preserved as imported.

OT hours before FY2023 are not directly comparable to FY2023 and later because the source methodology changed. Some names, agencies, and other fields may be redacted in the source and are displayed as provided.